agentic_security vs anti-slop
The two are close in size: 2.0k stars for agentic_security, 1.0k for anti-slop. Over the days we have tracked them agentic_security moved +4.7% and anti-slop +131.3%, so anti-slop is growing faster right now.
anti-slop leads on context depth. agentic_security does not take any axis by a clear margin.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
Agentic Security focuses on agent/workflow-focused, multimodal (text, image, audio) and multi-step attack/fuzzing capabilities (including RL-based and dataset mutation approaches) to evaluate LLM vulnerabilities beyond single-shot prompt tests.
- Stars
- 2.0k
- Tracked growth
- +4.7%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 3d ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Cost to run
- Your LLM API key, usage billed by the provider
A rule-based filter with a mandatory PASS/FAIL Delivery Gate and liveliness toolkit focused on removing generic AI-generated UI and copy without prescribing visual style.
- Stars
- 1.0k
- Tracked growth
- +131.3%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 18h ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free to use; runs locally or via your agent/API
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | agentic_security | anti-slop |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Prompt-only | ●●●●● Diff + related files |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Thresholds/config | ●●●●● Hard gates + report |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Config + modules | ●●●●● Configurable skills & dials |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hostable | ●●●●● Self-hostable |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Bring-your-own-key | ●●●●● Any agent / BYOK |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● One-command start | ●●●●● One-command / npx |
Which one to pick
Pick agentic_security if…
Easy setup — pip-installable and runnable locally with configurable datasets and modules to quickly run multimodal, multi-step vulnerability scans against your LLM endpoints.
Pick anti-slop if…
Easy setup — one-command picker or a single-file install drops a portable, non-prescriptive filter into many coding agents so you can stop AI 'slop' fast.
- Context depth: Diff + related files (3/5 against 1/5)
What people want from each one
msoedov/agentic_security
Hacker News: Agentic Security – LLM Vulnerability Scanner drew 2 points and 0 comments.
Questions people ask
Is agentic_security better than anti-slop?
anti-slop leads on context depth. agentic_security does not take any axis by a clear margin. agentic_security is worth picking when easy setup — pip-installable and runnable locally with configurable datasets and modules to quickly run multimodal, multi-step vulnerability scans against your LLM endpoints.
Which of agentic_security and anti-slop keeps my code private?
agentic_security: Self-hostable (4/5). anti-slop: Self-hostable (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
agentic_security: Your LLM API key, usage billed by the provider. anti-slop: Free to use; runs locally or via your agent/API.
Full profiles: msoedov/agentic_security and miqdadbadjuber/anti-slop. Everything else in Security & guardrails.