agentscope vs agno
The two are close in size: 30.7k stars for agentscope, 42.1k for agno. Over the days we have tracked them agentscope moved +16.3% and agno +2.1%, so agentscope is growing faster right now.
They split the axes: agentscope leads on context depth, agno on model freedom.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
A production-ready agent framework offering multi-tenancy, fine-grained permission controls, sandboxed workspaces, and an extensible middleware/event system for building trustworthy agent services.
- Stars
- 30.7k
- Tracked growth
- +16.3%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 1d ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Cost to run
- Requires a model provider API key (provider-dependent).
An end-to-end agent framework delivering an SDK, AgentOS runtime, and a management UI with built-in storage, observability, and human approval for running agent platforms.
- Stars
- 42.1k
- Tracked growth
- +2.1%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 39m ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Cost to run
- Free, self-hosted
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | agentscope | agno |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Diff + related files | ●●●●● Diff only |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Human-in-the-loop | ●●●●● Human approval |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Extensible middleware & tools | ●●●●● Configurable SDK |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hostable | ●●●●● Self-hostable |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Provider-specific | ●●●●● Multiple providers |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● API key + config | ●●●●● Quickstart (Docker) |
Which one to pick
Pick agentscope if…
Production-ready — choose AgentScope when you need a deployable, multi-tenant agent platform with sandboxed workspaces and fine-grained permission controls.
- Context depth: Diff + related files (3/5 against 1/5)
Pick agno if…
Privacy-first — own and run your agent stack (AgentOS) with self-hosted storage, JWT RBAC, human approval, and observability.
- Model freedom: Multiple providers (3/5 against 1/5)
What people want from each one
agentscope-ai/agentscope
Hacker News: AgentScope: Lego-style Agent Building Platform from Alibaba Qwen drew 2 points and 0 comments.
agno-agi/agno
Hacker News: Show HN: Agno – A full-stack framework for building Multi-Agent Systems drew 76 points and 19 comments.
Questions people ask
Is agentscope better than agno?
They split the axes: agentscope leads on context depth, agno on model freedom. agentscope is worth picking when production-ready — choose AgentScope when you need a deployable, multi-tenant agent platform with sandboxed workspaces and fine-grained permission controls.
Which of agentscope and agno keeps my code private?
agentscope: Self-hostable (4/5). agno: Self-hostable (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
agentscope: Requires a model provider API key (provider-dependent).. agno: Free, self-hosted.
Full profiles: agentscope-ai/agentscope and agno-agi/agno. Everything else in Agent SDKs & frameworks.