agno vs CopilotKit
The two are close in size: 42.1k stars for agno, 37.2k for CopilotKit. Over the days we have tracked them agno moved +2.1% and CopilotKit +9.4%, so CopilotKit is growing faster right now.
CopilotKit leads on model freedom and setup ease. agno does not take any axis by a clear margin.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
An end-to-end agent framework delivering an SDK, AgentOS runtime, and a management UI with built-in storage, observability, and human approval for running agent platforms.
- Stars
- 42.1k
- Tracked growth
- +2.1%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 39m ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Cost to run
- Free, self-hosted
Provides a multi-platform generative UI and shared-state SDK that lets the same agent run across web, mobile, and chat via the AG-UI Protocol.
- Stars
- 37.2k
- Tracked growth
- +9.4%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 10h ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Your LLM API key (third‑party); optional CopilotKit Cloud (separate pricing).
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | agno | CopilotKit |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Diff only | ●●●●● File-level context |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Human approval | ●●●●● Human-in-the-loop |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Configurable SDK | ●●●●● Configurable skills & hooks |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hostable | ●●●●● Self-hostable (cloud optional) |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Multiple providers | ●●●●● Bring-your-own key |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● Quickstart (Docker) | ●●●●● One-command quickstart |
Which one to pick
Pick agno if…
Privacy-first — own and run your agent stack (AgentOS) with self-hosted storage, JWT RBAC, human approval, and observability.
Pick CopilotKit if…
Easy setup — get an agent-powered generative UI in minutes with npx create and plug in your LLM key to deploy across web, mobile, and chat.
- Model freedom: Bring-your-own key (5/5 against 3/5)
- Setup ease: One-command quickstart (5/5 against 3/5)
What people want from each one
agno-agi/agno
Hacker News: Show HN: Agno – A full-stack framework for building Multi-Agent Systems drew 76 points and 19 comments.
CopilotKit/CopilotKit
Hacker News: Show HN: CopilotKit- Build in-app AI chatbots and AI-powered textareas drew 197 points and 67 comments.
Questions people ask
Is agno better than CopilotKit?
CopilotKit leads on model freedom and setup ease. agno does not take any axis by a clear margin. agno is worth picking when privacy-first — own and run your agent stack (AgentOS) with self-hosted storage, JWT RBAC, human approval, and observability.
Which of agno and CopilotKit keeps my code private?
agno: Self-hostable (4/5). CopilotKit: Self-hostable (cloud optional) (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
agno: Free, self-hosted. CopilotKit: Your LLM API key (third‑party); optional CopilotKit Cloud (separate pricing)..
Full profiles: agno-agi/agno and CopilotKit/CopilotKit. Everything else in Agent SDKs & frameworks.