aihawk_mcp_server vs dots
The two are close in size: 32.3k stars for aihawk_mcp_server, 32.3k for dots. Over the days we have tracked them aihawk_mcp_server moved +2.2% and dots +3534.3%, so dots is growing faster right now.
aihawk_mcp_server leads on model freedom. dots does not take any axis by a clear margin.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
An anti-detect, human-like web-browsing agent that runs locally and drives pages (pointer movement, keystrokes) to avoid captchas and blocks while exposing an MCP server.
- Stars
- 32.3k
- Tracked growth
- +2.2%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 5d ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Your OpenRouter key
Provides a real, patched Firefox engine that presents a consistent, human-like fingerprint (no WebDriver flags) so the agent interacts with sites without obvious automation traces.
- Stars
- 32.3k
- Tracked growth
- +3534.3%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 5d ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Your OpenRouter API key
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | aihawk_mcp_server | dots |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Diff only | ●●●●● Single page only |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● None mentioned | ●●●●● None mentioned |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Config flags & .env | ●●●●● CLI flags & options |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hosted run | ●●●●● Cloud via OpenRouter |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● OpenRouter + MCP | ●●●●● OpenRouter only |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● One command + key | ●●●●● Install + API key |
Which one to pick
Pick aihawk_mcp_server if…
Run locally — when you need a controllable, anti-detect browser agent that simulates human interaction and can be plugged into assistants or a local web UI.
- Model freedom: OpenRouter + MCP (3/5 against 1/5)
Pick dots if…
Anti-detection browser — pick dots when you need a local agent that emulates a consistent human identity (screen, fonts, timezone, pointer events) and preserves profiles while using models via OpenRouter.
What people want from each one
feder-cr/aihawk_mcp_server
Questions people ask
Is aihawk_mcp_server better than dots?
aihawk_mcp_server leads on model freedom. dots does not take any axis by a clear margin. aihawk_mcp_server is worth picking when run locally — when you need a controllable, anti-detect browser agent that simulates human interaction and can be plugged into assistants or a local web UI.
Which of aihawk_mcp_server and dots keeps my code private?
aihawk_mcp_server: Self-hosted run (4/5). dots: Cloud via OpenRouter (3/5).
What does each one cost to run?
aihawk_mcp_server: Your OpenRouter key. dots: Your OpenRouter API key.
Full profiles: feder-cr/aihawk_mcp_server and feder-cr/dots. Everything else in Browser agents.