artemis vs cc-haha
The two are close in size: 13.1k stars for artemis, 15.1k for cc-haha. Over the days we have tracked them artemis moved +975.3% and cc-haha +11.2%, so artemis is growing faster right now.
They split the axes: artemis leads on setup ease, cc-haha on model freedom.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
Provides a native MCP server that lets AI IDE assistants drive real Android devices with multimodal targeting, safety nets, and replayable diagnostics.
- Stars
- 13.1k
- Tracked growth
- +975.3%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 18d ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Cost to run
- Self-hosted runtime; model usage may incur cloud API costs
A desktop-first, local-first Claude Code workstation that combines worktree-aware code diffs, Computer Use desktop control, H5 remote access and IM integrations in one app.
- Stars
- 15.1k
- Tracked growth
- +11.2%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 4h ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- NOASSERTION
- Cost to run
- Requires configuring your model provider API key (third‑party billing applies)
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | artemis | cc-haha |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Diff + related files | ●●●●● Diff + Worktree |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Pre-exec Safety Net | ●●●●● Approval gating |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Custom rules & profiles | ●●●●● Plugins & per-project |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hostable | ●●●●● Self-hostable |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Multiple providers | ●●●●● BYOK + local models |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● One-click start | ●●●●● API key & config |
Which one to pick
Pick artemis if…
Easy setup — one-click local server and native MCP IDE integrations to run reliable, safety-gated automation on real Android devices with rich diagnostics.
- Setup ease: One-click start (5/5 against 3/5)
Pick cc-haha if…
Local-first — pick this when you want a desktop agent that runs against your repo/worktree with built-in diffing, permission approvals, extensible skills and multi-provider model support.
- Model freedom: BYOK + local models (5/5 against 3/5)
What people want from each one
google/artemis
NanmiCoder/cc-haha
Questions people ask
Is artemis better than cc-haha?
They split the axes: artemis leads on setup ease, cc-haha on model freedom. artemis is worth picking when easy setup — one-click local server and native MCP IDE integrations to run reliable, safety-gated automation on real Android devices with rich diagnostics.
Which of artemis and cc-haha keeps my code private?
artemis: Self-hostable (4/5). cc-haha: Self-hostable (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
artemis: Self-hosted runtime; model usage may incur cloud API costs. cc-haha: Requires configuring your model provider API key (third‑party billing applies).
Full profiles: google/artemis and NanmiCoder/cc-haha. Everything else in Computer use.