claude-code vs cline

claude-code is much bigger: 144.1k stars against 67.5k. Over the days we have tracked them claude-code moved +4.4% and cline +4.3%, so claude-code is growing faster right now.

cline leads on context depth and noise control and customization and privacy and model freedom. claude-code does not take any axis by a clear margin.

Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.

Where they stand today

A terminal-first agent that executes routine coding tasks and integrates git workflows, plus @claude GitHub tagging.

Stars
144.1k
Tracked growth
+4.4%
Maturity
Last commit
15h ago
Language
Python
License
none declared
Cost to run
Anthropic cloud; see docs

Provides a unified, extensible SDK + CLI + editor integrations with multi-agent Kanban and real shell command execution for coordinated, project-wide edits.

Stars
67.5k
Tracked growth
+4.3%
Maturity
Last commit
2h ago
Language
TypeScript
License
Apache-2.0
Cost to run
Bring-your-own API key or run local models
0%+4%52 tracked days
anthropics/claude-codecline/cline

Six axes, head to head

Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.

Axisclaude-codecline
Context depth
How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository.
Diff / file only
Whole-repo analysis
Noise control
How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only.
No noise controls
Human-in-loop + rules
Customization
How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config.
Plugins & config
Project rules & plugins
Privacy
Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only.
Cloud service only
Can run fully local
Model freedom
Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one.
Anthropic only
Any provider / local models
Setup ease
What it takes to get a first useful run out of it.
One-command install
One-command install

Which one to pick

Pick claude-code if…

Easy setup — install with one command to get a local, terminal-native coding assistant that helps with git workflows and code explanation.

Runs in pr-bot, cli, ide. Works with anthropic.

Pick cline if…

Flexible model support — use any provider or run local models, with an extensible SDK, editor plugins, and CLI for controlled, project-wide code changes.

  • Context depth: Whole-repo analysis (5/5 against 1/5)
  • Noise control: Human-in-loop + rules (4/5 against 1/5)
  • Customization: Project rules & plugins (5/5 against 3/5)
  • Privacy: Can run fully local (5/5 against 2/5)
  • Model freedom: Any provider / local models (5/5 against 1/5)
Runs in cli, ide, web-app, ci, coding-agent-plugin. Works with byok, openai, anthropic, gemini, local-ollama, other-fixed.

What people want from each one

Questions people ask

Is claude-code better than cline?

cline leads on context depth and noise control and customization and privacy and model freedom. claude-code does not take any axis by a clear margin. claude-code is worth picking when easy setup — install with one command to get a local, terminal-native coding assistant that helps with git workflows and code explanation.

Which of claude-code and cline keeps my code private?

claude-code: Cloud service only (2/5). cline: Can run fully local (5/5).

What does each one cost to run?

claude-code: Anthropic cloud; see docs. cline: Bring-your-own API key or run local models.

Full profiles: anthropics/claude-code and cline/cline. Everything else in CLI coding agents.