ECC vs OpenHands
ECC is much bigger: 249.0k stars against 86.2k. Over the days we have tracked them ECC moved +8.1% and OpenHands +6.4%, so ECC is growing faster right now.
They split the axes: ECC leads on noise control and customization, OpenHands on setup ease.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
A harness-native, cross-harness agent operating system that bundles skills, session/state memory, verification loops, and AgentShield for production multi-harness workflows.
- Stars
- 249.0k
- Tracked growth
- +8.1%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 16h ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free OSS; optional Pro GitHub App ($19/seat/mo) + your model/API costs
A backend-agnostic, self-hosted developer control center that lets you run and switch between local, remote, and cloud agent backends without reworking your workflows.
- Stars
- 86.2k
- Tracked growth
- +6.4%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 15h ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free to self-host; optional paid OpenHands Cloud/Enterprise
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | ECC | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Whole-repo analysis | ●●●●● Whole-repo access |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Severity gating | ●●●●● None mentioned |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Extensive configs | ●●●●● Configurable backends/profiles |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Fully local | ●●●●● Self-hostable |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Bring-your-own-key | ●●●●● Bring-your-own model |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● Config + API key | ●●●●● One-command start |
Which one to pick
Pick ECC if…
Production-ready — pick ECC when you need a self-hostable, operator-grade agent harness with built-in skills, memory, verification, and a GitHub App for PR audits.
- Noise control: Severity gating (5/5 against 1/5)
- Customization: Extensive configs (5/5 against 3/5)
Pick OpenHands if…
Self-hosting — run agents locally or on your own servers and connect multiple backends while keeping data in-house and integrating with tools like GitHub and Slack.
- Setup ease: One-command start (5/5 against 3/5)
What people want from each one
affaan-m/ECC
OpenHands/OpenHands
Hacker News: OpenHands: AI-Driven Development drew 1 points and 0 comments.
Questions people ask
Is ECC better than OpenHands?
They split the axes: ECC leads on noise control and customization, OpenHands on setup ease. ECC is worth picking when production-ready — pick ECC when you need a self-hostable, operator-grade agent harness with built-in skills, memory, verification, and a GitHub App for PR audits.
Which of ECC and OpenHands keeps my code private?
ECC: Fully local (5/5). OpenHands: Self-hostable (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
ECC: Free OSS; optional Pro GitHub App ($19/seat/mo) + your model/API costs. OpenHands: Free to self-host; optional paid OpenHands Cloud/Enterprise.
Full profiles: affaan-m/ECC and OpenHands/OpenHands. Everything else in Multi-agent orchestration.