hermes-agent vs ai-job-search
hermes-agent is much bigger: 256.1k stars against 63.2k. Over the days we have tracked them hermes-agent moved +16.3% and ai-job-search +127.1%, so ai-job-search is growing faster right now.
hermes-agent leads on privacy and model freedom and setup ease. ai-job-search does not take any axis by a clear margin.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
A self-hostable personal agent with a built-in closed learning loop that creates, persists, and self-improves skills from its own experience.
- Stars
- 256.1k
- Tracked growth
- +16.3%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 1h ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Your API key or Nous Portal subscription
Local-first, end-to-end job-application framework that scrapes portals, tailors LaTeX CVs/cover letters, runs a drafter–reviewer agent pipeline, and archives applications for repeatable, owned job hunting.
- Stars
- 63.2k
- Tracked growth
- +127.1%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 1d ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Requires Claude Code (Anthropic) CLI / third‑party access.
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | hermes-agent | ai-job-search |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Related files | ●●●●● Repo + documents |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Approval & allowlist | ●●●●● Reviewer + dedupe |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Skills & config | ●●●●● Templates & portals |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hostable | ●●●●● Third-party cloud |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Bring-your-own-key | ●●●●● Claude + others |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● One-command install | ●●●●● CLI + deps |
Which one to pick
Pick hermes-agent if…
Continual learning — pick Hermes when you want a self-hosted, continuously learning personal assistant that builds and improves skills across sessions and integrates with messaging platforms.
- Privacy: Self-hostable (4/5 against 2/5)
- Model freedom: Bring-your-own-key (5/5 against 3/5)
- Setup ease: One-command install (5/5 against 3/5)
Pick ai-job-search if…
Extensible end-to-end workflow — use it when you want a local CLI that orchestrates scraping, fit scoring, CV/cover-letter generation (LaTeX), and a reviewer agent to produce production-ready applications you control.
What people want from each one
NousResearch/hermes-agent
Hacker News: Nous Research edits GitHub issue to remove plagiarism claims about Hermes Agent drew 8 points and 1 comments.
MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search
Questions people ask
Is hermes-agent better than ai-job-search?
hermes-agent leads on privacy and model freedom and setup ease. ai-job-search does not take any axis by a clear margin. hermes-agent is worth picking when continual learning — pick Hermes when you want a self-hosted, continuously learning personal assistant that builds and improves skills across sessions and integrates with messaging platforms.
Which of hermes-agent and ai-job-search keeps my code private?
hermes-agent: Self-hostable (4/5). ai-job-search: Third-party cloud (2/5).
What does each one cost to run?
hermes-agent: Your API key or Nous Portal subscription. ai-job-search: Requires Claude Code (Anthropic) CLI / third‑party access..
Full profiles: NousResearch/hermes-agent and MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search. Everything else in Personal assistants.