hypit vs unlazy
hypit is much bigger: 18.8k stars against 3.8k. Over the days we have tracked them hypit moved +878.5% and unlazy +220.4%, so hypit is growing faster right now.
They split the axes: hypit leads on customization, unlazy on noise control.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
An end-to-end, agent-driven video workflow DSL that clones a reference video into editable, re-runnable compositions and ships mass variants (e.g., 100 variants) rather than producing single one-off renders.
- Stars
- 18.8k
- Tracked growth
- +878.5%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 1d ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- NOASSERTION
- Cost to run
- Open-source; can run locally for free, external model API costs may apply.
Implements the Depth Tree decomposition with a strict, evidence-backed runnable gate ledger that enforces approvals and re-verification for substantial agent tasks.
- Stars
- 3.8k
- Tracked growth
- +220.4%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 29d ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free to run locally; external agent API costs may apply
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | hypit | unlazy |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Project directory | ●●●●● Diff + related files |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● None mentioned | ●●●●● Approval & strict checks |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Pluggable components | ●●●●● Config files & templates |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Fully local option | ●●●●● Self-hostable |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Multiple providers | ●●●●● Specific agents |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● One-command install | ●●●●● One-command install |
Which one to pick
Pick hypit if…
Open-source local workflows — run fully editable video-generation pipelines on your machine and produce many variants from a single command without per-render vendor fees.
- Customization: Pluggable components (5/5 against 3/5)
Pick unlazy if…
Reproducible verification — use when you need strict, executable acceptance gates, recorded approvals, and re-verification for long-horizon agent work.
- Noise control: Approval & strict checks (4/5 against 1/5)
What people want from each one
hypit-ai/hypit
- Commercial licensing / partnership request: AGPL Bufflow with paid multi-tenant hosting 👍 0
- [Bug] Render: adding picture track causes cross-cue caption contamination 👍 0
- help：Processing a single video exhausted my usage quota; it only managed to process the video frames but didn't get around to rendering. 👍 0
Leonxlnx/unlazy
Questions people ask
Is hypit better than unlazy?
They split the axes: hypit leads on customization, unlazy on noise control. hypit is worth picking when open-source local workflows — run fully editable video-generation pipelines on your machine and produce many variants from a single command without per-render vendor fees.
Which of hypit and unlazy keeps my code private?
hypit: Fully local option (5/5). unlazy: Self-hostable (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
hypit: Open-source; can run locally for free, external model API costs may apply.. unlazy: Free to run locally; external agent API costs may apply.
Full profiles: hypit-ai/hypit and Leonxlnx/unlazy. Everything else in Workflow & graph engines.