langgraph vs Vibe-Skills
langgraph is much bigger: 41.1k stars against 3.2k. Over the days we have tracked them langgraph moved +19.2% and Vibe-Skills +41.1%, so Vibe-Skills is growing faster right now.
They split the axes: langgraph leads on setup ease, Vibe-Skills on context depth and noise control and customization and privacy.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
Provides low-level orchestration for long-running, stateful agents with durable execution and human-in-the-loop capabilities that typical stateless workflow engines do not emphasize.
- Stars
- 41.1k
- Tracked growth
- +19.2%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 1d ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free, open-source
Orchestrates and verifies multi-step work by discovering and assigning local Skill modules and enforcing end-to-end checks with resumable state.
- Stars
- 3.2k
- Tracked growth
- +41.1%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 4d ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Cost to run
- Free, self-hosted
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | langgraph | Vibe-Skills |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Diff only | ●●●●● Whole-repo analysis |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● None mentioned | ●●●●● Severity gating |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● No config | ●●●●● Config file options |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Third-party cloud | ●●●●● Self-hostable |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Fixed provider | ●●●●● Single provider |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● One-command install | ●●●●● Config + docs |
Which one to pick
Pick langgraph if…
Durable execution — choose LangGraph when you need persistent, stateful agents with human-in-the-loop oversight and production deployment support.
- Setup ease: One-command install (5/5 against 3/5)
Pick Vibe-Skills if…
Privacy-first — runs on your host and coordinates local Skill libraries to plan, execute, and verify complex multi-step tasks.
- Context depth: Whole-repo analysis (5/5 against 1/5)
- Noise control: Severity gating (5/5 against 1/5)
- Customization: Config file options (3/5 against 1/5)
- Privacy: Self-hostable (4/5 against 1/5)
What people want from each one
langchain-ai/langgraph
Hacker News: We chose LangGraph to build our coding agent drew 83 points and 20 comments.
foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills
Questions people ask
Is langgraph better than Vibe-Skills?
They split the axes: langgraph leads on setup ease, Vibe-Skills on context depth and noise control and customization and privacy. langgraph is worth picking when durable execution — choose LangGraph when you need persistent, stateful agents with human-in-the-loop oversight and production deployment support.
Which of langgraph and Vibe-Skills keeps my code private?
langgraph: Third-party cloud (1/5). Vibe-Skills: Self-hostable (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
langgraph: Free, open-source. Vibe-Skills: Free, self-hosted.
Full profiles: langchain-ai/langgraph and foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills. Everything else in Workflow & graph engines.