open-kritt vs pr-lens
The two are close in size: 2.4k stars for open-kritt, 2.3k for pr-lens. Over the days we have tracked them open-kritt moved +44.5% and pr-lens +204.7%, so pr-lens is growing faster right now.
They split the axes: open-kritt leads on context depth and noise control and customization, pr-lens on setup ease.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
Orchestrates focused AI agent workflows in disposable job containers to find, validate and de-duplicate real vulnerabilities with PoC generation and ranking.
- Stars
- 2.4k
- Tracked growth
- +44.5%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 48m ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- AGPL-3.0
- Cost to run
- Requires model API key (your provider's billing applies).
Generates animated architecture and data-flow diagrams that visualize a PR’s blast radius and step-by-step walkthroughs directly inside the pull request.
- Stars
- 2.3k
- Tracked growth
- +204.7%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 1d ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free for open source; otherwise your API key
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | open-kritt | pr-lens |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Whole-repo analysis | ●●●●● Diff + related files |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Deduplication & ranking | ●●●●● Configurable filters |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Workflow & rules | ●●●●● Config file options |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hosted (cloud models) | ●●●●● Cloud API key |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Bring-your-key (multiple) | ●●●●● Bring-your-own key |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● Docker + CLI setup | ●●●●● One-click App |
Which one to pick
Pick open-kritt if…
Self-hosted — run customizable, security-focused AI research workflows locally with built-in validation, de-duplication and BYO model access.
- Context depth: Whole-repo analysis (5/5 against 3/5)
- Noise control: Deduplication & ranking (5/5 against 3/5)
- Customization: Workflow & rules (5/5 against 3/5)
Pick pr-lens if…
Visual-first — install the GitHub App to get animated architecture and data-flow diagrams posted automatically to every PR so you can understand a change before reading its code.
- Setup ease: One-click App (5/5 against 3/5)
What people want from each one
Kritt-ai/open-kritt
coldteadotai/pr-lens
Questions people ask
Is open-kritt better than pr-lens?
They split the axes: open-kritt leads on context depth and noise control and customization, pr-lens on setup ease. open-kritt is worth picking when self-hosted — run customizable, security-focused AI research workflows locally with built-in validation, de-duplication and BYO model access.
Which of open-kritt and pr-lens keeps my code private?
open-kritt: Self-hosted (cloud models) (4/5). pr-lens: Cloud API key (3/5).
What does each one cost to run?
open-kritt: Requires model API key (your provider's billing applies).. pr-lens: Free for open source; otherwise your API key.
Full profiles: Kritt-ai/open-kritt and coldteadotai/pr-lens. Everything else in Code review agents.