PhyAgentOS vs PhyAgentOS
The two are close in size: 2.1k stars for PhyAgentOS, 2.1k for PhyAgentOS. Over the days we have tracked them PhyAgentOS moved +30.4% and PhyAgentOS +114.9%, so PhyAgentOS is growing faster right now.
Neither one leads on the six capability axes, so the choice comes down to which of them fits the way you already work.
Stars and commit dates come from our own daily tracking. The six axes are read off each project's documentation by our review pipeline, so they describe what a project says about itself, not what we measured in its code.
Where they stand today
Provides a session-centered runtime that decouples cognition from physical targets so the same agent workflows run across simulation and real hardware via small target adapters.
- Stars
- 2.1k
- Tracked growth
- +30.4%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 4h ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free, self-hosted; optional external services
Decouples cognition from physical hardware with a session-centered runtime and adapter/bridge architecture that lets the same sessions run unchanged across simulation and real robots while enforcing multi-layer safety and auditable execution.
- Stars
- 2.1k
- Tracked growth
- +114.9%
- Maturity
- ●●●●●
- Last commit
- 4h ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
- Cost to run
- Free, self-hosted
Six axes, head to head
Each axis runs 0 to 5. The label under a score is what that project's own docs claim, not a category average.
| Axis | PhyAgentOS | PhyAgentOS |
|---|---|---|
Context depth How much of your codebase it sees before it answers: the open diff, the diff plus related files, or the whole repository. | ●●●●● Workspace-wide context | ●●●●● Workspace & protocols |
Noise control How it keeps output volume down — severity thresholds, deduplication, incremental runs over new commits only. | ●●●●● Multi-layer safety | ●●●●● Multi-layer validation |
Customization How far it bends to your team: custom rules, prompts, style guides, per-path config. | ●●●●● Plugins & configs | ●●●●● Extensive configs & plugins |
Privacy Whether your code stays on your own infrastructure: fully local, self-hostable, or cloud API only. | ●●●●● Self-hostable | ●●●●● Self-hostable |
Model freedom Whether you can point it at any provider, or it is wired to one. | ●●●●● Specific adapters | ●●●●● OpenPI-focused |
Setup ease What it takes to get a first useful run out of it. | ●●●●● Easy CLI start | ●●●●● 5-minute quickstart |
Which one to pick
Pick PhyAgentOS if…
Hardware-agnostic — pick PhyAgentOS when you need a self-hostable, auditable runtime that runs identical sessions across sim and real targets with strict multi-layer safety.
Pick PhyAgentOS if…
Hardware-agnostic — one codebase to run identical sessions across sim and real robots with small target adapters, built-in safety layers, and auditable state/action logs.
What people want from each one
PhyAgentOS-Dev/PhyAgentOS
PhyAgentOS/PhyAgentOS
Questions people ask
Is PhyAgentOS better than PhyAgentOS?
Neither one leads on the six capability axes, so the choice comes down to which of them fits the way you already work. PhyAgentOS is worth picking when hardware-agnostic — pick PhyAgentOS when you need a self-hostable, auditable runtime that runs identical sessions across sim and real targets with strict multi-layer safety.
Which of PhyAgentOS and PhyAgentOS keeps my code private?
PhyAgentOS: Self-hostable (4/5). PhyAgentOS: Self-hostable (4/5).
What does each one cost to run?
PhyAgentOS: Free, self-hosted; optional external services. PhyAgentOS: Free, self-hosted.
Full profiles: PhyAgentOS-Dev/PhyAgentOS and PhyAgentOS/PhyAgentOS. Everything else in Robotics & embodied.